First, the pitch. The theoretical optimum here is 43 degrees. A standard estate roof sits around 35. The difference between those two is 22 kilowatt hours a year, about 0.6%. Chasing pitch in Westhill is worth almost nothing at all. Orientation and shading are the levers that genuinely matter, and the pitch debate you will be dragged into by other quotes is noise dressed up as expertise.
Second, the seasons. The same array is modelled at 487 kWh in May and 80 kWh in December. That is roughly six to one. Around three quarters of your year arrives between March and September, which means the case for solar here is a summer case and should be presented as one. A battery shifts summer surplus by hours; it cannot shift June into December, and anyone implying otherwise is selling rather than advising.
And what we actually quote. The model says 3,486 kWh a year for a south facing 4kWp array. We design and quote to 2,600 kWh. That is deliberately lower, because the model assumes a clean unshaded plane with a flat loss allowance and a typical year, and a real Westhill roof has a chimney, some soiling, an inverter that is not new, and occasionally a January that is not average. We would rather your system beat our number than miss it. Both figures are here so you can compare us against either, and so you can see exactly how far apart a model and a promise ought to sit.
Modelled with PVGIS v5.2, radiation database PVGIS SARAH2, meteo ERA5, reference period 2005 to 2020, horizon shadows on, at 57.153°N 2.279°W, elevation 127m, 4kWp crystalline silicon, 14% system losses, building mounted, azimuth due south.